Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Cobwebs and Creaking Hinges


It has been so long since I have written here that I could swear I felt that tickly feeling you get when you walk through the whispery wisps of webbing left by the cobs who adorn our unoccupied spaces. Yeah, I know these networks of silky threads really come from spiders, but I’d rather think that the creaking of hinges caused by my first-in-a-while post is disturbing a cob rather than angering a spider.

I suppose part of my withdrawal from spilling words here stems from the disappointment of not hearing from a Pennsylvania agent of bestsellers. She was the fourth agent to ask for my full manuscript. Having often read that only one in 200 queries results in such requests, I am always filled with promise and anticipation when someone wants to see By the Light in its entirety. This agent’s handwritten note of request had warmth and personality, so naturally I assumed that she would be the one who would guide me to the Promised Land. That she intimated that it would be three or four months before I would hear from her did not dampen my parade. Now that nearly double that amount of time has passed without a note, a call, or the return of my story in the free-ride envelope I provided, my parade seems awash in New Orleanian proportions of the wet stuff.

Well, let me tell you about a cure for the potholes and mountains situated between first-time novelists and “the dream.” My wife and I just spent a week in a 1930s cottage recently restored by Jane Coslick and complete with its own pool on Tybee Island, Georgia. We discovered two days before we arrived that it was featured in the May-June issue of “Cottage Living,” but as good as the spread in the magazine is, the real deal is way better. I have been in over half of the states and on a Caribbean island, and this little piece of heaven is the most peaceful and relaxing place I have ever experienced. The America I knew as a kid still exists there today. They have a saying there about “living on Tybee time.” It’s an attitude. The locals, lucky devils that they are, exude it. Visitors needn’t try to resist adjusting to the pace.

Rolling out of bed and into the pool in the morning was invigorating. Bicycling for hours on the beach and through the neighborhoods of quaint cottages and venerable beach houses was awesome. More than half of our baths were taken in our outside shower. Talk about liberation.

Shrimp and grits with scrambled eggs at the Breakfast Club, source of the victuals at the late junior John Kennedy’s Cumberland Island wedding party, was a treat had on two separate mornings. A.J.’s Dockside Restaurant, approachable by land or by sea, serves great seafood within its walls or on deck over the water. That the address printed on their hats, like the one I bought there two years ago, is stated in latitude and longitude rather than as a street number tells you a lot about this place. Then there's the Sundae CafĂ©. It might sound like an ice cream joint, but rest assured, they serve serious and memorable cuisine there. A class act they are.

Dinner at The Lady and Sons, where Paula Dean dishes out the best that Savannah has to offer, was indescribably delicious. My wife, a salmon aficionado, says they serve the best. Hey, I’m Louisiana born and bred, and I sort of cotton to her particular version of shrimp and grits. On another night, Churchill’s Pub provided a delectable diversion from the seafood in the form of roast beef and Yorkshire pudding. Dining on their rooftop was quite a delight.

Our last night in the Low Country was spent in Forsyth Park listening to the Neville Brothers and Ziggy Marley at an outdoor concert staged by the Savannah College of Art and Design to honor their new alumni on the eve of their commencement. Corporate citizens rarely contribute as much to a community’s ambiance and culture as SCAD does to Savannah. Having attended a lot of open-air musical events, I’ve seen some outstanding grazing and quaffing techniques, especially in my native state of Louisiana. From chilled microbrews and tailgate food to wine, brie, and fresh fruit, that diverse crowd of Savannahians and guests proved that they’ve got it honed to a genteel art.

Weather on Tybee from Saturday to Friday was as if it had been ordered from the deluxe section of a catalog. Not so for our Saturday of departure. We were awakened that morning by the sound of raindrops on our roof. It was fueled by a tropical depression coming up from the waters off of Florida, so things deteriorated as the day progressed. Not to be denied, we proceeded with our participation in the Tybee Tour of Homes. Opening the umbrellas, dashing from car to house, pulling blue disposable footies over our shoes, and reversing the process to drive to the next stop. The homes were fabulous and provided a bright ray of sunshine on a wet and cloudy day.

Rejuvenated, I can now endure waiting to see what happens, if anything, with the lady from the Keystone State. I’ve also started work on Tit for Tat, as short story of suspense with a villain every bit as twisted as the bad boy in By the Light. If there is a tarot card that represents a determination to not be denied, the seer might as well plop that sucker down right in front of me.

As for Tybee time, we have decided that it will come around for us every other year. The years in between will afford opportunities to see new and different places. Our long term plan is to have a place of our own on Tybee for whiling away a third to a half of each year of our retirement. Once our own hinges get creaky, it will be the place where we can relax to a speed that might put us in jeopardy of being webbed by cobs.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Enriched

In the About Me graph of this blog, it is mentioned that the seed that grew within me to attempt writing a novel was planted in childhood by a slightly older cousin. Blessed with intellect and maturity beyond his years, he was at that early age endeavoring to pen a sequel to L. Frank Baum’s Oz series. I know not what became of that effort. Such a project would never have crossed my mind even by the time I completed the three more years of life experience he had on me. Yet, he made it sound fun, exciting, and most importantly, doable.

That Rich dealt with the ravages of polio in his earliest years and was left with a slight limp and some muscular diminishment probably had something to do with his finding a niche in scholarship as opposed to boyish mischief or athletic pursuits. Truly a superior student with academic honors in his wake and innumerable possibilities in his future, my cousin chose a ministerial path. It is a blessing that he chose to journey through existence next to his Lord, for life would unfold into greater challenges.

After he married, Rich’s wife, Susan, would bear two daughters. The second child would have neurological problems at birth that would leave her intellectually and physically challenged for the rest of her life. She would need a constant caregiver. As it later turned out, Susan, who suffers from significant bipolar impairment and later became reliant on a wheelchair as a result of an automobile accident, would require substantial care, as well. Yet, the smallish and frail guy who had battled polio as a child proved equal to the task and more. Even in the face of burdens and obstacles, the elder daughter, Genevieve, was raised, educated, married, and now provides nursing care to those in need.

When I completed my novel, cognizance ran deep that By the Light would not exist had it not been for Rich. Consequently, I obtained his e-mail address and sent a message to let him know that I appreciated his provision of its genesis. It also expressed my hope that he would read the story and, since I valued his opinion, that he might comment on it. I never got a response and assumed either that he never got my message or that he simply had a lot on his plate.

I was shocked and pained to receive a call from my mom in Louisiana two days ago. She called to tell me that Rich and his challenged daughter, Sophia, had died in a house fire in Virginia. In our conversation she told me that my aunt had intimated that Rich had at some point mentioned my e-mail message. He'd told her that he was flattered that I’d thought of him and that I valued his opinion.

Rich had made his last visit to our hometown of Baton Rouge a while back, and my mom told me how wonderful he was with Sophia, by then an adult. More important than the thoughts I conveyed to him about my writing and his inspiration of it, I shared mom’s observation of what a good caregiver he was. She would know. My younger sister suffered encephalitis at 14 months of age and lived for almost 38 more years in a persistent vegetative state under Mom’s loving home care. I knew that, given the source, he would recognize her comment as high and knowledgeable praise indeed.

If I’m able to find an agent to represent me and actually get my novel sold and published, what a ride it will be. Rich will be with me in spirit for every inch of it, just as he always will be whenever I sit down to write.

I know, too, that his spirit will live on in the hearts of Susan and Genevieve, as well as in the hearts of his mom, Be Be to me, and his sister, Diane. May God bless them in this time of sorrow.

Monday, February 26, 2007

Ricochets

After receiving a comment from Rob Brooks, who blogs about the ongoing process of writing his first novel at Work in Progress, I decided to take a look at some of his posts. It became obvious to me that he and I approach our writing in different ways. I was inspired to leave a comment on Rob’s doorstep in this regard. Provided below, with some bracketed commentary from both Rob and me, is the gist of my comment on his page. It just goes to show there are more paths than one between points “a” and “b.”

When I started my completed manuscript, I had neither an idea how long it should be nor an inkling of what the story would be other than an intention to write about a serial killer. There was no outline. I simply wrote until I had a sufficiently long trail of blood, made my good guys adequately likable and inspiring, and revealed a villain both pitiable and worthy of hate. I ended up stopping at a bit over 72,000 words. I did some research that told me that novels fell between 50,000 and 100,000 words. It seemed I was right in the cozy middle, so I simply polished and tidied up. As you might have seen in some of my posts, I have since discovered that I might be a bit word-stingy for my genre, though James Patterson writes at about that count or less and seems to be prospering. One misconception, at least for me, revealed early in my writing process was that a keyboard would be the tool of creation. My experience with composing for business purposes was that the edit-on-the-fly capability provided by a computer was a good thing. I quickly found in writing my manuscript that I got too involved in editing and formatting and lost my creativity. In my case, story flowed much better from a pen. Granted, I wasn’t too happy about having to transcribe, but it really is all about creativity, characters, and story.

[Rob responded that his creativity flows right into his keyboard from his fingertips.]

My writing sessions were compartmentalized in the form of lunch hours spent up a spiral iron staircase in a loft windowed to overlook the main floor of a coffeehouse. Being in that environment came to mean putting my creativity in gear. The ability to observe the other patrons helped in writing people stuff, especially one scene that actually played out in a fictional coffeehouse. The story revealed itself to me in session after session, and I was excited each day to see where it would go.

I’d love to know the percentage of novelists who keyboard versus pen their works or who are outliners as opposed to spontaneous writers. It would be nice to know this in the overall, as well as segmented by authors categorized as the bestselling, the published, the middling, the struggling, and the unpublished. Another view might be by genre.


[Rob said, “I'd like to know, too. I know I would love to be a spontaneous writer. Stephen King claims to be, says he doesn't outline. I don't know how that could be, though, because there are so many things going on in his books, and they all tie together so nicely. He must change a lot in the edits.”]

[Red Stick Writer: I think sheer genius is the explanation for King. Simply in terms of subject matter, I’m not crazy about all of his stories, but they are told masterfully. Others of his stories, The Stand for instance, are among the best I’ve ever read. I would probably not have read it, but a friend strenuously recommended it. I’ll be forever grateful. Though I only saw the movie, The Shawshank Redemption, based on a King novella, was a great tale, too. His On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft is one of the best books about writing to be found.]

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Watching My Peeves and Queues

I’m still waiting to hear from the agent who has my complete manuscript. I queried her on September 13, 2006, and her request for the full story arrived on September 23. She asked if I could increase my word count, so I reread By the Light in order to answer. My response and the manuscript were sent for her consideration on October 4.

She had indicated that it would be three or four months before I would hear from her. The wait was on. I basked in the glory of having my whole manuscript in the hands of an agent for about a month.

Not wanting to bask in excess, I started tinkering with expansion ideas. That’s when I was horrified to discover that the first page of the manuscript contained a sentence fragment. I had apparently gotten distracted when making a minor modification before mailing to the agent. Rather than let my potential agent-to-be and beacon of hope think that I don’t know the difference between sentences and fragments, I sent a follow-up letter on November 7. I explained and apologized for the error and provided a replacement first page. Hopefully, dressing the message up with a touch of self-deprecating humor will work in a manner similar to wrapping Fideaux’s pill in a piece of cheese.

It is now a tad beyond the four months originally indicated as necessary for consideration of my baby. I am a perpetual optimist about these things. It is not my practice to give up on an agent until I receive their correspondence announcing that a plump female vocalist has unleashed a terminal aria. Rather than think negatively, I would rather believe that the literary expert so loves my novel as to require a second reading in order to compose words adequate to express the intensity of their desire to represent my work.

The energy required for such positive thinking comes at a price. It makes me cranky. Just ask my wife. One has a tendency to become peevish when in queue. If that happens, it helps to vent. In that vein, I am taking this opportunity to highlight a few things that make me even crazier than awaiting a literary verdict.

First up is why so many people, the Prez included, insist on saying “nuke-you-lar” instead of uttering a nuanced “new-clear” ever so much more like the spelling. Being the Prez is no indicator of one’s mastery of pronunciation. Take, for example, Gerald Ford’s manner of saying “judg-uh-ment” as if perhaps the word was spelled j-u-d-g-e-m-e-n-t and that first e was not silent. Someone eventually got to him, as he quit doing it prior to the end of his Presidency. I have been told by one friend who graduated from law school that one of his professors told his classes that he would fail them if they ever spelled judgment with that extra e. I could talk about JFK getting cigars from Castro’s C-u-b-e-r, but I believe I’ve made my point.

Next, what is the deal with the inability of some people to pronounce pundit, which is correctly uttered exactly as it is spelled. Most notable among those who make this mistake are pundits themselves. For some reason, they seem to think they are instead something that sounds like it is spelled p-u-n-d-a-n-t. Merriam-Webster says that a pundit is a person who gives opinions in an authoritative manner usually through the mass media. It could be that the talking heads that keep popping up on our TV screens are simply something else that ends in a-n-t. Pundits who call themselves “pun-dants” seem somehow similar to a mathematician who says, “Pi(e) are not square, pi(e) are round.”

Then there is that I-me thing that teachers have drilled so deeply into formative minds over all these years. It is a matter of subjective versus objective pronoun usage. An example of the subjective case is: Bob and I explained our position to the boss. An objective usage is: The boss asked Bob and me to explain our position. Speaking or writing the sentences with out “Bob and” makes the correct pronoun obvious. Either the teachers have overemphasized “I”, or the students failed to hear the argument for “me.” Whatever the case, it seems that the use of I occurs in objective instances more often than does me, and that ain’t write.

That’s enough with the words. What’s wrong with the huge number of people who insist on turning on their parking lights instead of their headlights when driving at dusk (or dawn)? Not only do they do it, but they seemingly do it smugly, as if they know something we don’t know. Perhaps someone should inform them that dusk, already a very dangerous driving period, is not a good time for them to fool other drivers into believing they are parked. Besides, when does that precise moment occur at which you recognize dusk’s end and switch to the headlights, assuming you both remember and have not been in an accident.

Thanks for listening. Please forgive my peevishness. I feel better.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Fiction No Stranger than Truth

During the course of writing By the Light, I thought it would be interesting to shine some light on abusive priests. The man of the collar was killed by a murderer whom he had abused in youth. To maintain my serial killer’s custom, I had to pick a lighthouse at which he would tell his story through the staging of bodies. My choices were to set the scene at a light in the Deep South near the site of the priest’s demise or at a light in Baltimore near the District of Columbia turf where he intended to select his next victim from the perennial bumper crop of philandering politicians. I ultimately chose to have him dispose of the body at a nautical beacon in my home state of Louisiana.

I wrote that sequence of events on my lunch hour in the cozy loft at the City Market Coffeehouse in Kansas City. On my way across the state line to my abode in Kansas that evening, I was listening to the radio news when a story was related about a victim in Baltimore who shot and wounded the priest who abused him years before. The newscaster said it was the first incident in which a victim had resorted to violence against his un-priestly abuser. The near intersection of fiction and reality almost caused me to steer off the road.